Whats the better makeup?: Maybelline pure minerals foundation or L’Oreal true match minerals ?

pure minerals makeup
Broken Pearls asked:


I know bare minerals is supposed to be better, however i do not have access to this.

Whats more worth it out of the two above?
Which one gives you the best coverage?
Which one last longest throughout the day, and what one lasts longest in terms of months?

Anything else about teh above products would be great!
To jessica: http://www.boots.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10052&productId=335581&callingViewName=&langId=-1&catalogId=11051
http://www.boots.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10052&productId=44959&callingViewName=&langId=-1&catalogId=11051

I think you will find they do exist. Whose the retard now?

Create a video blog…instantly.

5 Comments

  1. Posted November 6, 2009 at 7:43 am | Permalink

    both of those items dont even exsist retard

  2. Hannah M
    Posted November 9, 2009 at 8:32 am | Permalink

    L’Oreal Bare Naturale

    is great and it has a whole line of blush concealer and glow (plus foundation)

    its great

  3. Posted November 10, 2009 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    I hear L’oreal is better a lot of make up artists use that foundation.

    I have always had issues with maybelline breaking me out or turning bad quickly, so I really try to stick with L’oreal.

    I do know that maybelline has samples so you could try that see if it works for you or not

  4. Posted November 14, 2009 at 12:06 am | Permalink

    loreal is better..it gives good coverage and stays more..

  5. Nova
    Posted November 17, 2009 at 4:25 am | Permalink

    I think they are pretty equal in quality and coverage.

    you should go for that brand which has the perfect colour for your skin tone - I cannot buy L’OrĂ©al, because their colours are too dark for me - stuck with essence pure mineral (a cheap but good one, btw) or Maybelline (rose ivory matches perfectly :-D)

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*